<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>OmanDev &#187; Touch Screen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.omandev.net/tag/touch-screen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.omandev.net</link>
	<description>Technical, computer related articles and projects.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 18:54:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>SonyEricsson X2 vs HTC Touch Pro 2 (Fight of the Windows Mobile Slider Phones Giants)</title>
		<link>http://www.omandev.net/2009/11/sonyericsson-x2-vs-htc-touch-pro-2-fight-of-the-windows-mobile-slider-phones-giants/</link>
		<comments>http://www.omandev.net/2009/11/sonyericsson-x2-vs-htc-touch-pro-2-fight-of-the-windows-mobile-slider-phones-giants/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Arkan Hadi</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ericsson]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Phones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sony]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Touch Pro]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Touch Pro 2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Touch Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WM 6.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X2]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.194/~omandevn/wrd1/wordpress/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
VS 

Those high end devices are similar in features in almost every aspect, however the SE X2 is yet to be released, and the HTC Touch Pro (TP) 2 has been released since may, 2009 (yes, SonyEricsson is lagging way behind). In this article i am going to illustrate the differences in both devices, which [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.omandev.net/2007/07/surface-a-rich-mans-gadget/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Surface &#8220;A Rich Man&#8217;s Gadget&#8221;'>Surface &#8220;A Rich Man&#8217;s Gadget&#8221;</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://img.gsmarena.com/vv/pics/sonyericsson/se-x2-1.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="cursor: pointer; width: 600px; height: 435px;" src="http://img.gsmarena.com/vv/pics/sonyericsson/se-x2-1.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a><br />
<span style="font-weight:bold;">VS </span><br />
<a href="http://img.gsmarena.com/vv/pics/htc/htc-touch-pro2-02.jpg" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="cursor: pointer; width: 580px; height: 474px;" src="http://img.gsmarena.com/vv/pics/htc/htc-touch-pro2-02.jpg" border="0" alt="" /></a></p>
<p>Those high end devices are similar in features in almost every aspect, however the SE X2 is yet to be released, and the HTC Touch Pro (TP) 2 has been released since may, 2009 (yes, SonyEricsson is lagging way behind). In this article i am going to illustrate the differences in both devices, which might help decide on which one to take</p>
<p>The main obvious software advantage of the X2 over the TP2 is that X2 has Windows Mobile 6.5 while TP2 has Windows Mobile 6.1. however HTC TP2 can be upgraded to Windows Mobile 6.5 either by a developer made frameware (Cooked ROM as HTC developers calls it) or an official upgrade from the HTC site.</p>
<p>X2 has Optical trackpad, stereo speakers, 3.5 mm audio jack while TP2 doesnt have those goodies.</p>
<p>Screen size of the TP2 is 3.6 inches while in X2 its 3.4 (2 more inches DO make a difference in the mobile phones world)</p>
<p>A big advantage of X2 over the TP2 is the camera, which is 8 MP while in TP2 its 3.15 MP (but the way i see it, if you are fond by cameras, get a good stand alone camera)</p>
<p>In terms of user interface experience, the X2 has its famous, well known XPERIA panels user interface, while the TP2 has its own (also famous in HTC world) TouchFLO 3D Interface.</p>
<p>Everything else in those two high end phones are almost identical, it finally comes down to you, wither you prefer XPERIA panels user interface or TouchFLO 3D Interface. and of course wither you prefer to have a relatively good camera in your phone or not, but bare in mind that the X2 is yet to be released (first months its price will be skyrocket &#8220;very high&#8221;) while the HTC Touch Pro 2 has been around since Last May (2009), with almost identical features as the SonyEricsson X2.</p>
<p>SonyEricsson now is ranked number 5 (believe it or not) in mobile market share in 2009, lagging behind Nokia, Samsung, LG, and even Motorola. SE now seems that it is  trying to cut down manifacturing low end devices, and concentrate on high end, smart devices, i am not sure if its the right move in these economically difficult times, or is it?</p>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
omandev.net English feed</div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.omandev.net/2007/07/surface-a-rich-mans-gadget/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: Surface &#8220;A Rich Man&#8217;s Gadget&#8221;'>Surface &#8220;A Rich Man&#8217;s Gadget&#8221;</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.omandev.net/2009/11/sonyericsson-x2-vs-htc-touch-pro-2-fight-of-the-windows-mobile-slider-phones-giants/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Surface &#8220;A Rich Man&#8217;s Gadget&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.omandev.net/2007/07/surface-a-rich-mans-gadget/</link>
		<comments>http://www.omandev.net/2007/07/surface-a-rich-mans-gadget/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jul 2007 05:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>szakwani</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Future]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft Surface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multi Touch Screen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Surface]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Table top]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Touch Screen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://66.147.242.194/~omandevn/wrd1/wordpress/?p=6</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[

Surface
                Did we really reach the future? Some would stop and think on such a question but it surely is a leap ahead for the Microsoft Surface. The device is actually sculptured into a kitchen table topped with a 30 [...]


Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.omandev.net/2009/11/sonyericsson-x2-vs-htc-touch-pro-2-fight-of-the-windows-mobile-slider-phones-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SonyEricsson X2 vs HTC Touch Pro 2 (Fight of the Windows Mobile Slider Phones Giants)'>SonyEricsson X2 vs HTC Touch Pro 2 (Fight of the Windows Mobile Slider Phones Giants)</a></li>
</ol>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_emLBvfBccUg/RqWWyY1Y1GI/AAAAAAAAAAM/GtqQQ8L4Xn8/s1600-h/logo.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 101px; height: 95px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_emLBvfBccUg/RqWWyY1Y1GI/AAAAAAAAAAM/GtqQQ8L4Xn8/s200/logo.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5090640746216215650" border="0" /></a>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" spt="75" preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">  <v:stroke joinstyle="miter">  <v:formulas>   <v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0">   <v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0">   <v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1">   <v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2">   <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth">   <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight">   <v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1">   <v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2">   <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth">   <v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0">   <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight">   <v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0">  </v:formulas>  <v:path extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" connecttype="rect">  <o:lock ext="edit" aspectratio="t"> </v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_i1025" type="#_x0000_t75" style="'width:48pt;">  <v:imagedata src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\szakwani\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image001.png" title=""> </v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]--></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="line-height: 115%;font-size:18;" >Surface<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="">            </span>    Did we really reach the future? Some would stop and think on such a question but it surely is a leap ahead for the Microsoft Surface. The device is actually sculptured into a kitchen table topped with a 30 inch touch screen in a clear acrylic frame. It has got five cameras to enable multi touch access to music, photos, surf the web, exchange files and many more. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="">            </span>    Surface history takes us back to 25 years of history when <st1:place st="on"><st1:placename st="on">Toronto</st1:placename> <st1:placetype st="on">University</st1:placetype></st1:place> started working on the multi touch screen (Bell Labs). The surface idea came later on 2001 with the Microsoft Company. In 2003 a go ahead was given by the Microsoft chairman Bill Gates. After a month a T1 prototype was later design which was based on IKEA table.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shapetype id="_x0000_t75" coordsize="21600,21600" spt="75" preferrelative="t" path="m@4@5l@4@11@9@11@9@5xe" filled="f" stroked="f">  <v:stroke joinstyle="miter">  <v:formulas>   <v:f eqn="if lineDrawn pixelLineWidth 0">   <v:f eqn="sum @0 1 0">   <v:f eqn="sum 0 0 @1">   <v:f eqn="prod @2 1 2">   <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelWidth">   <v:f eqn="prod @3 21600 pixelHeight">   <v:f eqn="sum @0 0 1">   <v:f eqn="prod @6 1 2">   <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelWidth">   <v:f eqn="sum @8 21600 0">   <v:f eqn="prod @7 21600 pixelHeight">   <v:f eqn="sum @10 21600 0">  </v:formulas>  <v:path extrusionok="f" gradientshapeok="t" connecttype="rect">  <o:lock ext="edit" aspectratio="t"> </v:shapetype><v:shape id="_x0000_s1027" type="#_x0000_t75" style="'position:absolute;" wrapcoords="-105 0 -105 21501 21600 21501 21600 0 -105 0">  <v:imagedata src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\szakwani\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image001.png" title="">  <w:wrap type="tight"> </v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]-->    Surface is said to be a new era of computing, although it uses mostly the same consumer<a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_emLBvfBccUg/RqWXPo1Y1II/AAAAAAAAAAc/a0o6vq9yJn0/s1600-h/Surface+touch.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 0pt 10px 10px; float: right; cursor: pointer;" src="http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_emLBvfBccUg/RqWXPo1Y1II/AAAAAAAAAAc/a0o6vq9yJn0/s320/Surface+touch.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5090641248727389314" border="0" /></a> technology such as a 2GB of RAM, Core 2 Duo chip etc, which seems that “it is going to replace old machines”. The frustrating mess of cables, drivers and protocols that people must use to link their peripheral devices to their personal computers, seems to have come to an end. Surface has no cables or external USB ports for plugging in peripherals. Surface has no keyboard, no mouse, no trackball — no obvious point of interaction except its screen.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="_x0000_s1026" type="#_x0000_t75" style="'position:absolute;margin-left:392pt;margin-top:86.85pt;width:198pt;" wrapcoords="-65 0 -65 21513 21600 21513 21600 0 -65 0">  <v:imagedata src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\szakwani\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image003.png" title="">  <w:wrap type="tight"> </v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]--><span style="">            </span>    Surface specifications are, a 30-inch multi touch screen displayed in a table-like form, 22 inches high, 21 inches deep, and 84 inches wide. The Surface interior frame is powder-coated steel. The software platform runs on Windows Vista and has wired Ethernet 10/100, wireless 802.11 b/g, and Bluetooth 2.0 connectivity.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">    How it works, the Surface features a touch interface, but it doesn&#8217;t use a touch screen. Instead, five separate cameras are used to record motion on the table&#8217;s surface. The cameras were <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_emLBvfBccUg/RqWXd41Y1JI/AAAAAAAAAAk/DHOD3cY3JXE/s1600-h/surface.JPG"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer;" src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_emLBvfBccUg/RqWXd41Y1JI/AAAAAAAAAAk/DHOD3cY3JXE/s320/surface.JPG" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5090641493540525202" border="0" /></a>needed because of field angle issues. In order to get the table in a small size, five cameras are used so that each one can control a small area of the surface. Having multiple cameras also helps in a better resolution and speed than a single camera with an exceptionally wide-angle view of the table surface. Data is transferred as dots which are called “domino”. The entire surface of Surface is bathed in light, by illuminating the top of the table; the cameras can easily see when things are placed on it. Shining colored light across the surface of the table would spoil the effect, so near-infrared light is used for invisible illumination and not reading heat signatures. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Microsoft notes four main components being important in <i>Surface&#8217;s</i> interface: </p>
<p class="ListParagraphCxSpFirst" style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.25in;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family:Symbol;"><span style="">·<span style="">         </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span dir="ltr">direct interaction</span></p>
<p class="ListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.25in;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family:Symbol;"><span style="">·<span style="">         </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span dir="ltr">multi-touch contact</span></p>
<p class="ListParagraphCxSpMiddle" style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.25in;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family:Symbol;"><span style="">·<span style="">         </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span dir="ltr">a multi-user experience</span></p>
<p class="ListParagraphCxSpLast" style="margin-left: 1in; text-indent: -0.25in;"><!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="font-family:Symbol;"><span style="">·<span style="">         </span></span></span><!--[endif]--><span dir="ltr">object recognition</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="text-indent: 0.5in;"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!--[if gte vml 1]><v:shape id="_x0000_s1028" type="#_x0000_t75" style="'position:absolute;margin-left:0;margin-top:32.35pt;width:108pt;" wrapcoords="-165 0 -165 21355 21600 21355 21600 0 -165 0">  <v:imagedata src="file:///C:\DOCUME~1\szakwani\LOCALS~1\Temp\msohtml1\01\clip_image005.png" title="">  <w:wrap type="tight"> </v:shape><![endif]--><!--[if !vml]--><!--[endif]--><span style="">            </span>    Surface’s actual use is not very clear yet as it seems like a rich man’s gadget. The real question <a onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}" href="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_emLBvfBccUg/RqWYQY1Y1KI/AAAAAAAAAAs/vMSCLmt8Ilo/s1600-h/blue+screen.png"><img style="margin: 0pt 10px 10px 0pt; float: left; cursor: pointer; width: 109px; height: 83px;" src="http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_emLBvfBccUg/RqWYQY1Y1KI/AAAAAAAAAAs/vMSCLmt8Ilo/s320/blue+screen.png" alt="" id="BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5090642361123919010" border="0" /></a>that still lies “Is it worth $10k when all that could be done, can actually be done”? Using a normal PC, most of the functionalities can actually be performed in fact by just moving a mouse a couple of inches. The market has seen wonders of Microsoft launching products but all that really matters is consumer’s experience. One wonders if the Surface actually has a blue screen of death. </p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="">            </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">    Can you create your own surface? Well I think we all can, having a touch screen with the necessary consumer technology, what is left is applications to display graphic and understand movements, not to forget that a carpenter also plays part in the design.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Link to Microsoft surface: <a href="http://www.microsoft.com/surface/">http://www.microsoft.com/surface</a></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">You-tube links :<object height="350" width="425"><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/CZrr7AZ9nCY" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" height="350" width="425"></embed></object></p>
<div class="blogger-post-footer">&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
omandev.net English feed</div>


<p>Related posts:<ol><li><a href='http://www.omandev.net/2009/11/sonyericsson-x2-vs-htc-touch-pro-2-fight-of-the-windows-mobile-slider-phones-giants/' rel='bookmark' title='Permanent Link: SonyEricsson X2 vs HTC Touch Pro 2 (Fight of the Windows Mobile Slider Phones Giants)'>SonyEricsson X2 vs HTC Touch Pro 2 (Fight of the Windows Mobile Slider Phones Giants)</a></li>
</ol></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.omandev.net/2007/07/surface-a-rich-mans-gadget/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
